🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.